Sometimes just other thing are more important than updating Web-pages. At time of writing it was true.
nowadays easiest is to use KGS to estimate differences. Petri 2009/8/18 Tomasz Wegrzanowski <[email protected]>: > gnugo homepage seems quite spectacularly inaccurate. > > http://www.gnu.org/software/gnugo/gnugo.html says: This is a tough question. > Against humans, its results vary a lot depending on how well the human knows > its weaknesses, and on other factors (time settings, hardware, etc.), but most > robots running GNU Go on one of the go servers achieve a rank of 8k-9k. > Compared to other go programs, it may be 1-2 stones weaker than the > top commercial go programs. > > That doesn't seem like anywhere near 1-2 stones weaker than top > commercial go programs, > more like 8-10 stones weaker. > > > _______________________________________________ > gnugo-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel > -- Petri Pitkänen e-mail: [email protected] _______________________________________________ gnugo-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
