The current solver works with 600 variables (it takes about two hours) but
I am planning to solve 5-10 times more and I am not sure it will be
feasible.

Frédéric Parrenin


2013/2/4 Frédéric Parrenin <parre...@ujf-grenoble.fr>

> I am playing with about 600 variables.
>
> Frédéric Parrenin
>
>
>
> 2013/2/4 Morten Welinder <mort...@gnome.org>
>
>> > I also noticed that the newton iterations converge a lot more quickly
>> than
>> > the Rosenbrock iterations, at least in some circumstances.
>> > Would it be possible to make an option for the algorithm which is
>> chosen?
>>
>> That's not really feasible interface-wise: the current solver bounces
>> back and forth between the Rosenbrock steps and Newton steps.
>>
>> Note that when Newton iteration is attempted basically for as long
>> as it improves the situation.  In other words, there would be no way
>> of continuing if you were just using just Newton iteration.
>>
>> How many variables are you playing with?  We're recomputing the
>> NxN Hessian for every Newton step.  that might be expensive with
>> lots of variables.
>>
>> M.
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
gnumeric-list mailing list
gnumeric-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumeric-list

Reply via email to