Le vendredi 01 octobre 2010 à 07:15 +0200, Nils Durner a écrit : > From IRC: > > > 18:41:55] <ndurner> milanbv: in case you're interested: > > http://twitter.com/ioerror/statuses/25947077701, > > https://gitweb.torproject.org/ioerror/tor.git/blob/7b6373f7f58e5acc3f73aa49240fe2f65e798198:/doc/tor-fw-helper.1.txt > > [18:47:11] <milanbv> based on miniupnpc too? > > [18:47:20] <ndurner> no idea > > This commit says it uses miniupnpc: > > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor.git/commit/3eaa9a376c756b0b8f836c4a78c3cf4012d6ffd7 Indeed, thanks! They seem to be using miniupnpc directly, just like our current code in src/nat. My local version has become really different from it ATM.
At least I'm happy to know we haven't duplicated efforts. The GNUnet scheduler model is quite specific, but the idea of using asynchronous networking and splitting functions into callbacks may be useful to somebody else - I should advertise it when it's done, and not too ugly. Cheers _______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
