Am 11.02.19 um 16:51 schrieb Christian Grothoff: > After all, the question is at > what size one really needs to break things up more, right?
For me this is not a question of LOCs, but more on the project structure. If I would want to develop on e.g. filesharing, I don't want spend any thought and any time on the secushare stuff, reclaim or conversation. But if not taking special care, all of this will get build (and tested) even if I'm not working on it. I'm not going to touch it and I don't want test to fail simply because someone pushed buggy code on master when I merged. -- Schönen Gruß Hartmut Goebel Dipl.-Informatiker (univ), CISSP, CSSLP, ISO 27001 Lead Implementer Information Security Management, Security Governance, Secure Software Development Goebel Consult, Landshut http://www.goebel-consult.de Blog: https://www.goe-con.de/blog/deshalb-tr-069-ausschalten Kolumne: https://www.goe-con.de/hartmut-goebel/cissp-gefluester/2010-01-hinterturen-allen-ortes
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
