Schanzenbach, Martin transcribed 2.6K bytes: > > > > On 26. Apr 2019, at 00:41, [email protected] wrote: > > > > I've been playing around with clang-format a bit more. > > > > @@ -239,7 +239,8 @@ GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_forever_ () > > * Convert relative time to an absolute time in the > > * future. > > * > > - * @return timestamp that is "rel" in the future, or FOREVER if > > rel==FOREVER (or if we would overflow) > > + * @return timestamp that is "rel" in the future, or FOREVER if > > rel==FOREVER (or > > + * if we would overflow) > > */ > > > > > > would this cause problems with doxygen? > > > I don't think it does, not sure.
Okay, I'll read into doxygen to see if it's okay.
> > In general it's uhm... weird. But I guess we're mostly okay
> > with clang-format then it seems. I disagree with some of
> > its suggestions, like
> >
> > @@ -927,8 +929,7 @@ GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_monotonic (const struct
> > GNUNET_CONFIGURATION_Handle *cf
> > /**
> > * Destructor
> > */
> > -void __attribute__ ((destructor))
> > -GNUNET_util_time_fini ()
> > +void __attribute__ ((destructor)) GNUNET_util_time_fini ()
> > {
> > (void) GNUNET_TIME_absolute_get_monotonic (NULL);
> > }
> >
> >
> > but I guess you have to make compromises once you rely on
> > such a tool.
>
> Actually I think this is a bug and not expected behaviour. Maybe we should
> file a bug here.
Could be intended behavior?
But reporting a bug is good.
fyi this was in src/util/time.c
Thanks.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ GNUnet-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
