> The slightest glimpse of disastrous copy law is an optical to said ideal > frame for maximizing creativity.
Of course, I mean, 'obstacle', not 'optical'. --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- Von: <[email protected]> Datum: 10.01.2022 14:42:15 An: [email protected] Betreff: Re: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes > My 2 cents: > > Take a look around. Your crib, the tech stuff in front of you, look down > at your clothes. Think of all the immaterial goods, which have made your > days of the past, and how much they formed you. All of that: A product of > creativity—useful and new, at the same time. > > How much do we appreciate this? Where would we be without it? Still in caves? > > > The appropriate way to appreciate is giving back by maximizing creativity. > > > But, you can't. You can't directly. It's like being spontaneous. > When someone asks you to be spontaneous, you can't by that moment. > > Creativity only can be maximized by forming the frame, in which creativity > arises. > And that frame has 2 adjusting screws: > 1. The more variety, the more tension—especially contrary, especially > contrast—there > is within a network system, the more creativity arises out of it. > 2. The more connections there are within a network system, the more creativity > arises out of it. > > So, the frame which maximizes creativity is one, where there are all kinds > of entities and all of them are directly connected with each others. It's > a place of everything and no boundaries. > > That means: It's a place where all immaterial goods are copylefted commons—not > even requiring linking a specific immaterial good to a subject, who has made > it. > The slightest glimpse of disastrous copy law is an optical to said ideal > frame for maximizing creativity. > > Best for all of us would be, if all immaterial goods including artwork is > shared, not attempted to be owned whatsoever. And not only that, on top of > that this state of freedom being defended. > > > Best regards, > Bastian Schmidt > > --- Ursprüngliche Nachricht --- > Von: carlo von lynX <[email protected]> > Datum: 09.01.2022 17:15:18 > An: [email protected] > Betreff: Idea: Owning Artworks On GNUnet using Non-Fungible Hashes > > > As much as I notoriously doubt that the end-to-end > > encryption Whatsapp actually stops agencies from > > having any insight, I appreciate Moxie's recent dive > > into the world of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs): > > > > https://moxie.org/2022/01/07/web3-first-impressions.html > > > > I heard similar doubts from CCC people last summer, > > but it is good for someone to put it in strong and > > clear terms, combining it with the critique against > > federation and open standards which the secushare.org > > website has been carrying for a decade now. > > > > The following implies you read that blog post first. > > It's an interesting worthwhile read. > > > > The "Web3" is a joke, as much as the people that claim > > to be into "crypto", then even fail to put a hash of > > a piece of art into the blockchain rather than just > > somebody else's URL. > > > > Obviously while I read all of that, I thought how on > > the basis of GNUnet instead it could all work out for > > real. > > > > 1. GNUnet is *meant* to run on all devices, including > > smartphones. The phone companies may have to adapt! > > There must not arise any "platform" web services that > > run the GNUnet node for you. We switched to AGPL > > license because of this and should pressure any > > alternative implementation of GNUnet to also be > > released under Affero GPL or stricter! As soon as > > we allow nodes to be run elsewhere than on the device > > of the owner, several of our design goals are gone - > > and the article illustrates how people do not care. > > > > 2. We already have consensus protocols on top of > > GNUnet. If we add a ledger we can store the ownership > > of hashes of artworks which AFAIR also happen to be > > the handles for retrieval on gnunet-fs. > > > > 3. If we implement the social graph in secushare.org > > we can avoid using dirty proof-of-work but rather > > provide a blockchain by proof-of-having-a-life. The > > proof that you exist and have a life is the fact > > that you have a social surrounding which isn't just > > avatars you created yourself. > > > > So, whoopa, we have a new Internet with a new > > distributed Facebook/Skype replacement, a way to > > do blockchain apps without ruining the environment > > and a way to prove ownership of digital artworks. > > > > > > > > > >
