I think our use of glade is historical.
It just made sense to somebody (not me, my guess is Christian).
I personally have no issue with moving away from glade as RAD tool as I
find it very cumbersome myself.
Note, however, that it will also mean writing a lot of code that is
currently hidden behind those glade XML files.
OTOH moving to a WIP RAD tool is also not such a smart idea, maybe. But
that depends on the maturity of cambalanche, which I cannot judge myself
right now as I have never tried it.
BR
On 27.02.24 20:19, Gotam Gorabh wrote:
Hello Martin,
Note that migration from gtk3 to gtk4 especially for gnunet-gtk is not
trivial: We use libglade, which does not exist for gtk4.
We will need to decide if we want to migrate to something like
https://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2023/09/28/cambalache-0-16-0-released/
<https://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2023/09/28/cambalache-0-16-0-released/> or
something different entirely.
Why can't we use the proper GObject concept like other gnome application
does? E.g. GNOME Settings, Nautilus, etc. which can handle the
properties, and signals in a structured way.
Thanks. Regards
Gotam Gorabh
