Hi Jeff,

I think a more appropriate venue for this type of discussion would be the 
OpenPGP Mailing List. See https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

Kind regards, 
Wiktor 



>Hello,
>
>   I was thinking, it's time for the OpenPGP standard to be updated with a 
>shorter form for the parts of inline messages that indicate a message is 
>signed and/or encrypted, to make it more useful for signing and/or encrypting 
>messages on services that limit the number of chars per message. For example, 
>a lot of Mastodon instances of the ActivityPub Fediverse, limit message length 
>to 500 chars. It's a lot to give up a large fraction of the message char 
>length for the following openpgp bits:
>
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA512
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>That's 108 characters just for OpenPGP. If that could be abbreviated, that 
>would save some precious chars for people's actual messages. I realize that 
>gnupg devels don't own the standard, but have to simply implement the 
>standard, but I thought you all might be in a position to advocate such a 
>change with whoever maintains the standard.
>
>So, for example, maybe something like:
>
>--BPSM--
>H: SHA512
>--BPSG--
>--EPSG--
>
>Which reduces the total char count down to 39 chars (of course, not counting 
>the actual encrypted hash) at least with SHA512 as the hash - of course, it 
>would be variable length because the hash abbreviation might be longer or 
>shorter for other hashes.
>
>Sorry if this has been previously discussed on the mailing list - the list 
>server does not provide a search function, and I couldn't find this in the 
>gnupg FAQ, or doing a web search for "shorter pgp signature".
>
>It does occur to me another approach would be to attach signatures to such 
>posts as an .asc file or .sig file, but as that may not always be an available 
>solution for everyone, it really seems like shortening the openpgp inline text 
>delimiters could be helpful in a lot of cases.
>

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

Reply via email to