Ben Finney <ben+freesoftw...@benfinney.id.au> writes: > Werner Koch via Gnupg-devel <gnupg-devel@gnupg.org> writes: > > > Do you have an example? > > Included in this message is a Python program ‘verify_test.py’. […] > > You can see that the ‘verify’ call succeeds (no error is raised), and > there is a single attached Signature. > > That Signature, though it has a valid timestamp and fingerprint, has ‘0’ > for all of ‘pka_trust’, ‘status’, ‘summary’, ‘validity’, and > ‘validity_reason’.
Has this helped understand the problem? What more diagnostic information can I provide? I am trying to make use of GPGME (via the Python wrapper) to verify signatures and interpret the result using the documented API. -- \ “If you always want the latest and greatest, then you have to | `\ buy a new iPod at least once a year.” —Steve Jobs, MSNBC | _o__) interview 2006-05-25 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Gnupg-devel mailing list Gnupg-devel@gnupg.org https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
