Hello, again,

Sachin T <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing the changes.

I pushed other changes (libtool macro, longlong.h and secmem.c).
Let me have some time for configure.ac.

> The wrapper approach worked for me.

Good.  Please go ahead with the wrapper approach.

If the EXTRA_LIBS_FOR_BUILD is only for GnuPG, it would be acceptable.
My concern is that it will be for (almost) all packages you build.

> I also wanted to mention that libgpg-error already uses
> EXTRA_LIBS_FOR_BUILD in its configure.ac for z/OS, so using the same
> method in libgcrypt would keep things consistent across both projects.

I see.  If the wrapper approach will be found good, we can consider
about reverting the part of libgpg-error change.
-- 

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel

Reply via email to