On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:55, Andrew Gallagher said: > Ed25519 follows the above spec, but Ed448 does not. Is this an error > in the specification or an error in the implementation?
Yes, that is an error in the specs. When I edited LibrePGP I included most of the SOS specification clarifications Niibe-san once proposed to the OpenPGP DT. They were unfortunately rejected or got lost by that major last rewrite of rfc4880bis. I will correct LibrePGP for ED448 so that it matches actual use. Shalom-Salam, Werner -- The pioneers of a warless world are the youth that refuse military service. - A. Einstein
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel
