On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 02:03:06PM -0500, David Shaw wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 01:41:46PM -0500, Jason Harris wrote: > > As you seem to have concluded, that fact takes precedence in my > > logic, and as I have concluded, it seems to take no precedence in > > yours. > > I can only conclude that we are talking completely past one another.
Then that only started with your last message, AFAICT. Prior to that, you seemed quite clear that the subject was about superceded non- revocable sigs. You even provided examples which, although they failed to prove your assertions, were about superceded non-revocable sigs. > You do seem to be very upset about all this, but I'm not detecting any Not at all. All my past statements still stand - the underlining and change in tone were for emphasis only. > more signal amidst the noise. I'm afraid I need to drop out of this > thread as I'm not really sure what you are advocating, or why, or if OK. > you're just arguing to argue. I'm genuinely sorry you don't seem to > be parsing what I'm saying, but there is nowhere else to go at this > point. I understand your statements quite well, as I had hoped would be clear each time I summarized them, found them to be bad examples, etc. > If you have an actual change suggestion, I'd love to hear it. But I > really do need: > > 1) What you think the current behavior is > 2) What you want it to be > 3) Why you feel this is better AFAICT, each and every one of my messages on the subject of superceded non-revocable signatures has carried the same message: they should be allowed. Last time I mentioned this, it seemed to help, so I'll say it again: We have a difference of opinion (over superceded non-revocable signatures). AFAICT, I understand your opinions just fine, and I thought we were communicating just fine. But, I do not wish to continue this thread either. My past posts still stand, of course, as I presume yours do, and I'll leave it at that. -- Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
pgpGawJoZEwLm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
