On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 07:46:44PM +0000, Uwe Brauer wrote: > >>>>> "David" == David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > David> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 05:21:13PM +0000, Uwe Brauer wrote: > >> >>>>> "David" == David Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > David> On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 04:18:00PM +0000, Uwe Brauer > David> wrote: There is only one version of the key whether it > David> is in PGP or GPG. Go ahead and submit it to any > David> keyserver you like. > >> > David> David > >> > >> I am confused. From what I read pgp 2.6 and gpg are not compatible, > >> see > >> <http://www.gnupg.org/gph/en/pgp2x.html> [1] > >> I cannot as a gpg user use the pgp public key in order to send a > >> message. > >> Do you agree? > > David> No. > > Aha, I asked some weeks ago about how to import my pgp 2.6 to gpg, > because following the rules mentioned above > gpg --import private.pgp > and the alike did NOT work, that is I used the imported key and tried > to send myself a message using enigmail and failed, > the reason seems to be IDEA (well you can compile IDEA support into > gpg however this is not standard.) > > See the messages: > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > and especially > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Where Werner advice to empty the pass-phrase in pgp2.6 import it to gpg > and then introduce a pass-phrase. > > So I conclude from that that a pgp2.6 with IDEA protected pass-phrase > is NOT the same as the imported key into gpg, where the pass phrase is > protected by other algorithm.
You changed the secret key. The public key is the one that goes on the keyserver and is exactly the same between PGP and GPG. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
