On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 07:54:09AM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 04, 2005 at 12:24:27AM -0400, Jason Harris wrote:

> > Thus, in reality, the "Expect: 100-continue" header appears to be confusing
> > SKS (during POSTs).
 
> Hmm.  No really good way to fix that in GPG or curl since they can't
> detect that a server is 1.0 without doing a GET first.  Curl, if I

Disregard that.

It isn't the Expect: header, it was the [s]scanf.  This patch fixes it:

diff -u -r1.5 dbserver.ml
--- dbserver.ml
+++ dbserver.ml
@@ -415,8 +415,9 @@
          let request = Wserver.strip request in
          match request with
              "/pks/add" ->
-               let keytext = Scanf.sscanf body "keytext=%s" (fun s -> s) in
+               let keytext = Scanf.sscanf body "keytext%s" (fun s -> s) in
                let keytext = Wserver.decode keytext in
+               let keytext = Str.string_after keytext 1 in
                let keys = Armor.decode_pubkey keytext in
                plerror 3 "Handling /pks/add for %d keys" 
                  (List.length keys); 

-- 
Jason Harris           |  NIC:  JH329, PGP:  This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] _|_ web:  http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/
          Got photons?   (TM), (C) 2004

Attachment: pgpIDzPHesXTN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to