On Thu, Sep 08, 2005 at 08:00:25PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:33:47AM +0200, Dirk Traulsen wrote:
> > 3. Because now I was irritated, I did the same again with a different > > keyserver 'keyserver.kjsl.com' and I got a completely different > > result! When I fetched the key 08B0A90B, here it didn't have 47 sigs, > > but only 15 sigs (see below output2). There was only a double self > > sig, which 'clean' removed later. How can this be, if the keyservers > > are synchronized? > > Looks like they're not all that well synchronized :) Well, keyserver.ubuntu.com is still not participating in email syncs to non-SKS keyservers, but that's a different problem. keyserver.kjsl.com is now stripping all GD sigs. The extra variable in kd_search.c and code for 'case 2:' of make_keys_elem(), respectively: static unsigned char gdkeyid[8] = {0x97, 0x10, 0xB8, 0x9B, 0xCA, 0x57, 0xAD, 0x7C}; if ((keyid.size == 8) && (keyid.offset == 0) && (memcmp (keyid.data, gdkeyid, 8) == 0)) { break; } -- Jason Harris | NIC: JH329, PGP: This _is_ PGP-signed, isn't it? [EMAIL PROTECTED] _|_ web: http://keyserver.kjsl.com/~jharris/ Got photons? (TM), (C) 2004
pgpKGmmP5MbVf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users