On Sunday 19 February 2006 01:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 12:33:03AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > I still don't understand why you use PKCS#1, PKCS#8, X.509, CMC, > > S/MIME and more... Why don't you invent some replacements for these > > too? > > Big news for you: We are here precisely because we prefer OpenPGP to > S/MIME. And *I* certainly don't use S/MIME. I use X.509 when really, > really forced to (for TLS/SSL HTTP, jabber, POP3, IMAP4, ... servers), > and then usually in a "flat" mode (self-signed certs, my own CA, > ...).
Realistically speaking, when free software does not interoperate with the commercial software with a large mindshare, it's the free software loss. On the other hand, the Samba project that enabled interoperation enjoyed tremendous support and success. -- Nick
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users