-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As far as I got from the documentation, gpgsm is no replacement but an extension for gpg (even when it may be run alone) for using S/MIME.
mkontakt schrieb: > Sorry to bother, but are there any differences between gpg and gpgsm > apps. The only difference I can see is the supported standards > (OpenPGP, S/MIME). Should I see gpgsm as a supplement to gpg and > pre-version for gpg2, which is the version with both standards > implemented? > > Thanks in advance > Martin > > _______________________________________________ > Gnupg-users mailing list > Gnupg-users@gnupg.org > http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users - -- ***************************************************************** * Thomas Widhalm Unix Administrator * * University of Salzburg ITServices (ITS) * * Systems Management Unix Systems * * Hellbrunnerstr. 34 5020 Salzburg, Austria * * [EMAIL PROTECTED] +43/662/8044-6774 * * gpg: 6265BAE6 * * http://www.sbg.ac.at/zid/organisation/mitarbeiter/widhalm.htm * ***************************************************************** -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD4DBQFEh+xBkbjs3GJluuYRAr1IAJiW4FrWoMDmFA0XKXx+wR5XomRqAKCYw80k p6BJRSETr8VT3Eic2x6W2Q== =ft3p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
