On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 12:02:12PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:03:20PM +0100, Tony Whitmore wrote: > > > I'm running Ubuntu Dapper. Am I right in thinking the entries in > > /proc/bus/usb/XXX/XXX should be modified to match the rules (i.e. group > > scard, mode 644)? Because they don't seem to be: > > Current systems with udev should use somewhere obviously named in /dev > by default, with libusb preferring them. It's those that get their > permissions changed. There are unresolvable races with using /proc.
Thanks for confirming this Mark. It's what I had suspected from the strace output [1]. gpg is certainly looking at entires in /dev/bus/usb when it runs, and doesn't seem to reference /proc at all. Having changed the permissions on the relevant device node, it hasn't changed the situation. Thanks, Tony [1] http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2006-July/028983.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
