Il /27 set 2006/, *David Shaw* ha scritto:
> On Wed, Sep 27, 2006 at 12:08:31AM +0200, Carlo Luciano Bianco
> wrote:
>> Well... Does this mean that we can link GnuPG to OpenSSL library
>> for ECC subroutines and stay safe from patent problems? If so,
>> this can be a temporary solution (of course, if OpenSSL license
>> is compatible with GnuPG one)...
>
> No, the licenses are not compatible.
I was afraid of something like that... :-/
> We had quite a problem (and
> are still fixing the fallout) with even a small license exception
> to allow linking the LDAP and CURL keyserver helpers to OpenSSL
> for ldaps and https.
Do you mean I would better change my tutorial to use only libcurl
with no SSL support?
> Plus there are the patent issues, which raise a very large
> headache for Free software in general.
I see...
> In any event, it doesn't matter even if the licenses were
> compatible: OpenPGP does not have ECC in it.
But ECC could be included in the new RFC2440-bis draft currently
being written, that's why I have asked about the status...
> GnuPG won't support
> ECC until the OpenPGP standard specifies it.
Of course...
> I don't see that
> happening any time soon, especially given the patent issues.
I see, this is the real problem... :-/
--
| ICQ UIN: 109517158
Carlo Luciano Bianco | Home page: <http://clbianco.altervista.org/>
______________________|________________________________________________
GnuPG RSAv4 4096 - Fingerprint:FA68CF697EA63865AAFA805F68703AD40609D743
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
