Ryan, I think I am with you. Or, to explain in language made much more complex then is necessary for human consumption, but to impress those with average IQ's. You extricated the unspoken verbiage from my oral orifice. ;-)
Cheers... Cary -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ryan Malayter Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 20:07 To: Mica Mijatovic Subject: Re: RFCs, standards, pink bunnies and flower patterns On 10/17/06, Mica Mijatovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ... > There is no any whimsicality in it (the previous message and wider) > and the answers/observations are given quite sternly and with a quite > fine necessary precision. > ... It's like reading Ulysses, but as a day in the life of Richard Stallman rather than Leopold Bloom. Featuring, of course, just marginally more frequent punctuation, sentence structure, and coherent thought. At this point, I am inclined to say: UNCLE! -- RPM ========================= All problems can be solved by diplomacy, but violence and treachery are equally effective, and more fun. -Anonymous _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
