On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 11:34:18PM +1030, Alphax wrote: > > DSA signatures contain random data, so even if you hacked around the > > timestamp problem, the signature would not match. RSA signatures do > > not contain random data. > > > > Err, I thought it was the other way around, which is why RSA signatures > are bigger than DSA signatures... or is the RSA signature > packaging-thing something else?
No, the random data is part of DSA. The reason that RSA is large and DSA is small is unrelated to the use of random data. David _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
