-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 George Orwell wrote: > do tempest resistant fonts exist?
First, it's not "tempest resistant". TEMPEST is the name of the NSA's standard on Van Eck-resistant hardware. What you're talking about is Van Eck surveillance. I know, I know, PGP Corporation calls it "Tempest resistance". They're wrong, too. Anyway, taking off the pedantry hat... I am unaware of any empirical evidence that suggests PGP's Van Eck-resistant fonts really offer much, if any, security against Van Eck surveillance. If you're dealing with people who are willing to park a van down the block and dedicate a crew of surveillance experts and a few thousand bucks of directional antennas and custom-built FPGAs at you, my best advice is to (a) run away and (b) build a Faraday cage. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iFYEAREIAAYFAkeooC4ACgkQf2XByo0Cu7M8WgDbBHkrkNUpHMFZfykVffOsaTFw 9E3JVJ1mXBHmPgDdEdXJcN3vftBtGKw3va7zIPmNgVS/GmVFShYAWYkBHAQBAQgA BgUCR6igLgAKCRC3APSC/q+BCZ2ECACMdFOEH47rTF03Cm834FWFNnegnGs8UGXD z/uBEtrO212nIBSKXqEfLxL0137dnx8Y9e6NmU4XfxS5DhbpWY2baqiuJcSGVx7S VSQPHffe1QO31ehlWEChHysKQDZRC+TGpyg/d6JWx+QVn8iixq5qB4N9qIRUrLAK SV1pV4kA8TCPVCh/V8VfR77wdTjE4y5/vIn1iXcVpIZyieZUF3/5yYxN9fLU4m8H UJI7BZTd3KU5PnDmA0X/xPbQaf4fITq+BBc22omDsLu5UEdWpXxw/R92J+1+0op7 uoqxqh3Hq51GoIsItirFTGLvLElcYAKBZKHWeeauxktOcnrjwRrH =3//e -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users