David Shaw wrote: > Do people find the 1.4.x / 2.0.x thing confusing? Speaking for myself, no. But I'm pretty far from a normal user. Regular users are taught to think that bigger version numbers are better, more recent, more capable, more bug-free, etc.
Windows NT 3.51 --> Windows NT 4.0 Windows 2000 --> Windows 2003 Server FreeBSD 5.2 --> FreeBSD 6.0 Fedora Core 8 --> Fedora Core 9 GnuPG 1.4 --> GnuPG 2.0 One of those is not like the other, but I think the average user would be hard-pressed to figure which is which. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users