> So did you. This scheme is poorly specified, based on an incorrect > understanding of user needs, as a practical matter can be cracked, is > rife with implementation difficulties, and you seem to have no > understanding of the implicit tradeoffs and compromises which go into it.
I'm sure you are right. Ian! Sorry. There is no way to solve your problem. Don't even have a try. :-> Gabor _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
