-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Andrew Berg escribió: > Werner Koch wrote: >> I do not think that this is a too good idea. Newer version of GnuPG (in >> particular Gpg4win) add a whole bunch of DLLs and other binaries to this ... > I installed the regular package (gnupg-w32cli-1.4.9.exe), and the only > library in the directory is iconv.dll. Without Gpg4win, I don't see a > problem.
Same here... By the way, I still don't understand the benefit from GPG2... at first I thought the addition of support of x509 certificates would allow to use them in a ring of trust model (like the PGP model), but I am not even sure about if GPG2 can generate such certificates... but I remember I saw, when the cetificate generation bug in OpenSSL for debian machines was discovered, a site said "certificates generated by GnuPG are not affected". For those reasons, if somebody asks if it is hard to install GPG on windows, I say "no, install version 1.4.9, it is easy" ;-) Best Regards P.S: I know GPG2 is supposed to work with outlook, but I don't use outlook at all, so... -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJIt3luAAoJEMV4f6PvczxAT8UH/RRULZXXIPW5QKauLtctGCJj Z508ATve16e9Zx9eyoSCiQAtrXp255pqjrxqrNe1RqeFq24APx6RuJLUUa6NPwH2 84qFxxPceyOLOxJykc2SYnk/PDHR7Qr+4v1vDg828F/74nbpqRNLbGs5YI+IzMQc K27IolnvDvapAI3/I3xN1rhbjnLh+Bl7Bfcq8l1CJY4xh2rQIZm8blO4bU0RXq56 DrDg+/HrArg9ucppnayu6ulyDMwicDN4a7exgZHYb3jS3QHUsjhXzEl3WU0fcvp4 uvmie8fpIYCWAxK9rMcYgFwjQZca2a0yW6wnArrBRBos+nKV+n1s1vyVuktoWwU= =5PeA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users