David Shaw wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 08:03:12AM +0200, Sven Radde wrote:
>> Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 19:49 -0400 schrieb David Shaw:
>>> A revocation certificate, on the other hand, doesn't
>>> have all that much that can be removed. Luckily revocation
>>> certificates are pretty short to begin with. The only real advantage
>>> that paperkey could bring to revocation certificates is the per-line
>>> CRC, which makes retyping easier.
>> Yes, that's the point.
NAME
uuencode, uudecode - encode a binary file, or decode its
encoded representation
SYNOPSIS
uuencode [source-file] decode_pathname
uuencode [-m] [source-file] decode_pathname
uudecode [-p] [encoded-file]
uudecode [-o outfile] [encoded-file]
uuencode -m .gnupg/secring.gpg ./
Does the trick for me.
Less than 100 lines and good paper printable.
Sincerely yours,
Morten
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
