On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Robert J. Hansen <r...@sixdemonbag.org>wrote:
> Avi wrote: > > Yes, Robert, that is possible. However, IIRC, signatures come with a > > time stamp. > > The OpenPGP time stamp is not a trusted timestamp and should not be > relied upon for any trusted purpose. Point taken. > > > > In the case I am envisioning, the quotER is taking it from > > somwhere, and the quotEE can show the prior, complete post. > > > > Yes, this does not prevent someone from pre-creating two different > > messages, but someone resorting to that level of duplicity is both > > uncommon and will likely have other prevaricatory methods as well. > > There's no pre-creation necessary in the scenario I outlined. Maybe I > just know an uncommon class of scoundrels, but that level of > skullduggery is fairly tame in my experience. > Again, point taken, and remind me not to trust your friends with my wallet 8-) Thanks for the explanations, Robert. --Avi ---- en:User:Avraham pub 1024D/785EA229 3/6/2007 Avi (Wikipedia-related) <aviw...@gmail.com> Primary key fingerprint: D233 20E7 0697 C3BC 4445 7D45 CBA0 3F46 785E A229
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users