On Mon, 8 Jun 2009 22:37, kloec...@kde.org said: > got a '-' for this feature. Given this KMail clearly deserves a '+' in > the IMAP category IMNSHO, bringing it pretty much on par with Claws. (I
I noticed that and bet that this is due to the false claims of non-working Disconnected-IMAP - which was fixed many years ago. Sometimes you can't get rid of such rumours :-(. > don't understand why Claws has a ++ for security, but KMail only a +. > Is it because Claws cannot render HTML (without some plugin)?) Yes. And would like to add that it is less complex than Kmail with all the dependencies on the entire KDE stuff. Might be a more theoretical argument because Claws also relies on the OS and KDE is as much an OS as Windows is. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Auschnahme regelt ein Bundeschgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
