-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Would it be considered a best practice to rotate encryption subkeys on
an annual basis, or would that be considered overkill for most uses?
I realize that messages are encrypted using ephemeral session keys
which in turn are encrypted with public keys. Considering the small
amount of data (i.e. sessions keys) being encrypted using public keys,
are ciphertext attacks really even feasible?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJKlwLJAAoJEFGV1jrNVRjHpJUIAJ6Cv9cFXkNmSiXFjbxKlWjJ
TylQ+LDtLCwaauHVTO+hP7V557UoP5eGuB3KyD1G5Cp+4Ec3yD/vUhh8XkidEgqH
jSRQpvabpAvQL96i4IBvxMXG8s+uKtLfxf7NMNYeqSte/q7+kK+r1VGmunb0ukLO
+m+lRus94784NHx+ivcb21gmtozLEzvZi/Y3kOu8ZK/lAnUHYFsqK6H0hFYiXcEw
I1+Wk7iggDFcuS0GcWldlbiq70W+8477mlgyKAq1bTzEzZuOEf/vgXcr+/iQtk++
hZZlvBhYcsme0NFYWBXI/hrkvAfq3pJp0wcnNf+BaTYtFBemHcd4IecvWj8KC4w=
=9z+z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
