On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 10:17:52PM -0500 Robert J. Hansen wrote: > David Shaw wrote: > > However, if you managed to generate a 2048-bit key with a 224-bit q > > (as earlier versions of GPG did), all versions of GPG would > > (correctly) allow the use of SHA-224 with this key. > > When did this changeover take place, and is there any way to get the old > behavior back? >
Unless there is some inescapable constraint on the size of one's signature, I am hard pressed to think of a reason for using SHA224 when SHA256 is available. However, the question is worth asking if only to sate curiousity. -Kevin _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
