Hi erythrocyte
On Friday 12 March 2010 at 12:46:28 PM, you wrote: > If you really think about it, when you look at people who've gotten > convicted and/or framed based on plain text unsigned email, then it > goes to show that there's no point in inventing a technology that > specifically provides PD from a cryptographic perspective, because > unsigned email is already plausibly deniable. Yet juries & courts > regularly convict people despite their best efforts to claim > innocence, Who's to say what a regular Joe jury would think of about > such things. I would question whether the defence solicitor was fit to practice if he didn't produce expert witnesses who could explain this sufficiently clearly for the jury to understand. -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users