Jerry wrote the following on 11/17/10 12:26 PM: > A simple Google: "in-line PGP deprecated" will turn up numerous hits. > You also might want to see: Use PGP/MIME, aka RFC 3156
May I refer you to r...@sixdemonbag.org's post on the matter? >>> In any case, Outlook 2007 is deprecated also. Comparing a >>> nearly four year old version is counter productive. Update to the >>> 2010 version and see if your problems still exist. Ditto, please see r...@sixdemonbag.org comments on this issue. >> I have no intention to update Outlook because I don't intend to use it >> for practical purposes, but thanks for the advice. > > If you have no practical use for it then why bother inquiring? I didn't inquire. The inquire was initiated by bo.bergl...@gmail.com. > You > either use it or you don't. There is no such thing as "slightly > pregnant". Thank you for this valuable insight. > If you are going to use it, then use an updated version or > don't complain. I didn't complain. I merely informed bo.bergl...@gmail.com of how the application was behaving. > If I were to use an antiquated version of GnuPG and > experienced problems, what do you think might be the first thing I > would be advised to do? GnuPG 2.0.14 is antiquated? I am sure the gpg4win people will be interested to know. > >> This question should be answered by bo.bergl...@gmail.com. > > If you could not answer the question then why mention it in your > original post? I did not mention the question in my post. The matter was reported by bo.bergl...@gmail.com, and he is answering your question in a separate e-mail. Finally, I choose to answer appropriately and directly to Jerry <gnupg.u...@seibercom.net>. Charly _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
