On 12/14/10 1:12 PM, Robert J. Hansen wrote: > On 12/14/10 12:42 PM, Ben McGinnes wrote: >> They could be a result of using the old Cyber Knights Templar versions >> of PGP that cropped up in the mid-'90s which allowed creating 16Kb keys. > > What tool was used really doesn't interest me very much -- you can > create them with GnuPG, too, if you're willing to tweak the source a > little bit. What I find morbidly fascinating is contemplating what kind > of deranged individual would actually do this. :) >
Now I'm going to spend all day wondering if anyone's tweaked the source to make smaller keys. An eight-bit key would surely save your bandwidth, right? -- Grant "I am gravely disappointed. Again you have made me unleash my dogs of war."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
