On 27/02/11 3:28 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > > If you look at the characteristics of the actual messages encrypted > mail is very similar whether it's in-line or MIME.
Exactly, the encrypted output in both methods uses base-64 encoding. > It's signed messages that make things interesting because the > signature in a MIME message is actually (sort of) an attachment but > also sort of not, which is why it confuses simple mail readers like > Outlook Express. Lots of things confuse Outlook Express. As for attachments, at first glance the body of a message appears to be an attachment to the headers, which leads to all sorts of fun with munged mbox format inboxes. Or it did when I last had to pay attention to such things. Regards, Ben
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
