> yep. Phil Zimmerman noted that in his original essay on PGP.  If you
> have a malware infection you can no longer speak to what your computer
> is or is not doing.

In fact, it's quite a bit worse than that.  Your traffic is secure only so long 
as both endpoints are secure.  Depending on who does the numbers, 15%-30% of 
all desktops are pwn3d.  Even if your desktop is safe, the odds aren't good the 
other end will be, too.

There are many reasons why I feel OpenPGP is more or less irrelevant in the 
world today, outside of some very special case scenarios.  This is one of the 
big ones: OpenPGP's necessary precondition -- that our endpoints are both 
securable and secured -- is not met.



_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to