Johan Wevers wrote: > On 16-09-2011 21:30, Simone Cianfriglia wrote: > >> To achieve your desired result, it's required to run the exactly same >> compiler, including the version, with the same options targeting the >> correct architecture. Also a minor tweak in architecture settings >> could change the result, see for example the --march and --mtune >> directives of GCC to see how many choices there are. > > Which makes me wonder how hard it would be to build GnuPG 1.4.11 with MS > Visual Studio. Back in the pgp 2 days I put a VS 5 (antique version) > project file for pgp 2.6.3ia on my site to create a win2 binary - better > than the distributed MS-DOS binary, at least it could handle long > filenames. That was easy - just put all the .c files in the project. > > I'll just have to try. >
You're much better off with MinGW and dependencies or Cygwin. There was a move to try to write project files for Visual Studio some long time ago, but I don't think anything became of it. I have my own scripts, tuned bit by bit since 2004, but they are tailored to my use. -- John P. Clizbe Inet: John ( a ) Enigmail DAWT NET FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?" A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels" _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users