On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 18:47, li...@chrispoole.com said: > Is there a better way to get rid of these "errors"?
Yes, use gpg2. Using gpg and gpg-agent is just a kludge. gpg2 requires gpg-agent and thus we don't need those messages there anymore. Salam-Shalom, Werner -- Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
