sorry my previous message was sent in error. Please disregard. Thank you. On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 4:42 AM, Veet Vivarto <viva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Perhaps you find this relevant. I don't even begin to see why you are > interested in this. But who knows. > > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Werner Koch <w...@gnupg.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, 25 Dec 2011 19:00, nicholas.c...@gmail.com said: >> >> > It would be very good if there were still a way to completely 'sandox' >> (for >> > want of a better term) an instance of gpg, so that it uses its own key >> > rings and trust databases. I certainly find that for testing purposes >> it >> > is very useful indeed. On previous versions --homedir does this nicely. >> >> A easy way to do this is: >> >> GNUPGHOME=/foo/bar gpg-agent --daemon sh >> >> and then do whatever you want in this shell. If you are done run give >> an exit and with a few seconds that gpg-agent will be terminated. That >> is how I do almost all tests. >> >> >> Salam-Shalom, >> >> Werner >> >> -- >> Die Gedanken sind frei. Ausnahmen regelt ein Bundesgesetz. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gnupg-devel mailing list >> gnupg-de...@gnupg.org >> http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-devel >> > >
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
