On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 05:23:59PM +0100, Steve wrote in <946fffc5-a191-4073-9d69-fc7fdc695...@gpgtools.org>:
Of course, I really feel it's better for mailing list traffic to not
be signed at all, since usually all it gives us is a false sense of
security.  A signature from an unvalidated key belonging to an unknown
person whom we don't know from Adam doesn't mean much, if anything at
all.

You at least know that the person with that key is the author. That is some information. Should I still stop signing list mails? So far, I used to do that, because I though people then could check and if my key is signed by someone they know it's a lot of important information, right?

I appreciate signed mails on this list (and any other lists). Most problems these days on the internet are, in my opinion, related to people being completely anonymous. If you stand behind your words, show so by signing your posts.

Cheers,

Remco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to