On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 07:26:27PM +0200, Hauke Laging wrote: > This are the result (with a caches passphrase, of course). It's the same for > a > zeros file and a urandom file. And this is on a power efficient CPU... > (E-450, > which I guess doesn't have AES acceleration) probably without parallelization. > > So there's obviously a serious problem with your setup. A problem slowing the > process down two to three orders of magnitude which will hardly be solved by > adding a GPU.
I'm not trying to troubleshoot a problem. I think this thread is getting a bit off-topic. I'm only curious if work has been done is getting GPU support into GnuPG. Nothing more. Thanks, -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
pgp9UAnUGPNRd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
