On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +0200, Werner Koch wrote: > On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 20:12, aaron.topo...@gmail.com said: > > So, if the system can be improved by removing support for PGP2, which > > includes cleaning up code, squashing bugs, and tightening security, then > > why is it still around? 20 years later? > > BTW, removing the v3 support will not make the code magically less > complex. Removing mature code may actually introduce more bugs than > keeping it.
Thus, the reason I began with 'if'. :) -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
pgpeCt33quAzm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
