ved...@nym.hush.com wrote: > As the padding scheme in RSA, (OAEP) uses SHA-1, then , *eventually*, as > people move away from using SHA-1, and toward a V5 key where SHA-1 is not > used, > will it also be necessary to re-do the RSA padding to not use SHA-1, and > if so, would this fall under the open-pgp RFC, or would it have to go through > an > RSA standard first?
This is probably more on topic for the IETF-OpenPGP list, but anyway...
RFC 4880 makes no mention of OAEP. RFC 4880 references RFC 3447 for details of
RSA implementation.
So, from what I can tell, RSA standard first, then OpenPGP by incorporating
the new RSA standard. THEN, Gnupg.
[RFC4880] J. Callas, L. Donnerhacke, H. Finney, D. Shaw, R. Thayer.
"OpenPGP Message Format", RFC 4880, November 2007.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880
[RFC3447] Jonsson, J. and B. Kaliski, "Public-Key Cryptography Standards
(PKCS) #1: RSA Cryptography Specifications Version 2.1",
RFC 3447, February 2003. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3447
--
John P. Clizbe Inet: John (a) Gingerbear DAWT net
SKS/Enigmail/PGP-EKP or: John ( @ ) Enigmail DAWT net
FSF Assoc #995 / FSFE Fellow #1797 hkp://keyserver.gingerbear.net or
mailto:pgp-public-k...@gingerbear.net?subject=HELP
Q:"Just how do the residents of Haiku, Hawai'i hold conversations?"
A:"An odd melody / island voices on the winds / surplus of vowels"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
