Il 30/05/2013 13:17, Zece Anonimescu ha scritto: > Me thinks the difference is the people never bother to think the > concepts all the way. So it can be PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY (PD) with > certain organisations which are willing to let go because they are > swamped in cases or the particular agent handling your case is quite > lazy. But it can also mean it can mean PLAUSIBLE GUILTY (PG). And while > PD works only once, PG can go ad infinitum. And don't forget there are > some organisations which activate worldwide for which any suspicion > means guilty without any respect for the facts. That's why I don't like protocols requiring 'random' numbers: everything 'random' could actually be encrypted data to be used for a steganographic side channel...
BYtE, Diego. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
