On Thu, 2013-10-24 at 21:05 +0200, Sylvain wrote: > Is this zealotry on the Debian front, or something to update in gnupg? As they write,... they don't see a specific (i.e. technical or performance) reason not to do so.
Some people may argue that 2048 is secure enough for many many years to come. Similar things have been said for 1024 not so many years ago. And especially under the light of the NSA/friends scandal,... why using less when you have no strong reasons to do so? Cheers, Chris.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
