On 01/03/2014 08:12 AM, Leo Gaspard wrote:
> So changing the encryption could break an opsec.

If someone's opsec is based on the question of whether a message was
encrypted or not, then they've probably got their cart before their
horse too.

opsec requirements should indicate whether you encrypt, not the other
way around.

> BTW, is a timestamp included in the signature? If not, it could lead to 
> similar
> issues.

Yes, all OpenPGP signatures generated by standards-compliant tools
include a timestamp:

 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4880#section-5.2.3.4

        --dkg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to