> That is neither trivial nor reliable nor the best approach to deliver > this information.
It is a trivial fix; whether it is reliable depends on how committed participants are towards enforcing policy. > As I said in my first mail in this thread this isn't about changing > GnuPG at all because Then why are we talking about this? > As I also said the reason why I have asked this here is the availability > of people who can make useful comments on that (and are probably > interested in such general discussions). You are receiving useful comments. You are choosing to disregard them. :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
