-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Hi
On Friday 3 January 2014 at 10:28:28 AM, in <mid:2002014.1ckrbwp...@inno.berlin.laging.de>, Hauke Laging wrote: MFPA: >> Again, this would be flagged up if the sender was in >> the habit of signing outgoing messages (as you >> stated). > No, it wouldn't. The reason is that the signature is > created the same way in the two cases encrypted and > non-encrypted. Thus you can apply encryption later > with the recipient having no chance at all to determine > who encrypted. Most "signed and encrypted" messages created with PGP or GnuPG have the two processes applied together - you do not normally decrypt a message and then see a signed message as the output. An exception is "signed and encrypted" messages created in the Hushmail web interface. - -- Best regards MFPA mailto:expires2...@ymail.com Confusion is always the most honest response -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iPQEAQEKAF4FAlLKC0pXFIAAAAAALgAgaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEJBMjM5QjQ2ODFGMUVGOTUxOEU2QkQ0NjQ0 N0VDQTAzAAoJEKipC46tDG5p50IEAKcL07PhoNvgH52ulIc+5ZPbo3dm1MH1a8aK nrecrH7gdIkNgriytz7bgOyK5TWmmar2c0LdDqWN5qw+iq/BdcUpokwd2fZC3ckQ z9cJe4BWBwKaTXYMSc1DTeoHage0Awuuv8E3P6cpFm0C6hiyQATbZw3kH0U4XfXj mxykuAU+ =F7H3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users