On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:30:21PM -0400, David Shaw wrote: > Looks like a bug. Note that on each of the keys that didn't work there is a > direct signature on the key. This is not very common, and is usually used > for a designated revoker (i.e. "I permit so-and-so to revoke my key for me"). > I suspect there is a bug printing the fingerprints on a key from a key file > (rather than from a keyring) for keys with a direct signature.
Ah. Interesting. Should I file a proper bug against GnuPG then? -- . o . o . o . . o o . . . o . . . o . o o o . o . o o . . o o o o . o . . o o o o . o o o
pgp7jybYnMPZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users