On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 11:30:21PM -0400, David Shaw wrote:
> Looks like a bug.  Note that on each of the keys that didn't work there is a
> direct signature on the key.  This is not very common, and is usually used
> for a designated revoker (i.e. "I permit so-and-so to revoke my key for me").
> I suspect there is a bug printing the fingerprints on a key from a key file
> (rather than from a keyring) for keys with a direct signature.

Ah. Interesting. Should I file a proper bug against GnuPG then?

-- 
. o .   o . o   . . o   o . .   . o .
. . o   . o o   o . o   . o o   . . o
o o o   . o .   . o o   o o .   o o o

Attachment: pgp7jybYnMPZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users

Reply via email to