>> I think providing an official, complete, >> easily-understandable, up-to-date, reviewed and >> qualitative documentation by experts for beginners and >> experts is absolutely necessary for security-software. >> Therefore GnuPG is in need of that. > > I'm not sure about "official" in this context, but agree the rest is > at least desirable.
Impractical, perhaps. Good tech writers are rare; good tech writers who understand the intricacies of crypto and communications security are moreso; good tech writers who understand the intricacies and who are willing to keep everything up-to-date while not getting paid a dime for it are so rare as to be virtually nonexistent. _______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
