Am Di 24.06.2014, 09:50:04 schrieb Nex6|Bill: > anykind of "best practice", should > be simple, so that it encourages a sane baseline for people.
That depends on it whether you need security or the illusion of security is enough for you. IMHO it is one of the main problems that hardly anyone cares about telling protection levels apart. "Security" is a really wide spectrum, for some beginning at "random six letter passwords". You cannot say in a useful sense what is a good recommendation without looking at what is needed in the respective situation. Thus I advocate a standardized set of security levels for data, keys and systems. And authentication on the other hand: http://www.crypto-fuer-alle.de/wishlist/securitylevel/ (German only) Hauke -- Crypto für alle: http://www.openpgp-schulungen.de/fuer/unterstuetzer/ http://userbase.kde.org/Concepts/OpenPGP_Help_Spread OpenPGP: 7D82 FB9F D25A 2CE4 5241 6C37 BF4B 8EEF 1A57 1DF5
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Gnupg-users mailing list Gnupg-users@gnupg.org http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
